Health Concerns

Electro Magnetic Fields

Electro Magnetic Fields (EMFs)

There continues to be ongoing disagreement within the medical and scientific communities on the conclusiveness of evidence and degrees of linkage between EMFs and various illnesses and diseases.

The World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer (2001) classified Electro Magnetic Fields (EMFs), emitted from High Voltage Power lines, as “… possibly carcinogenic to humans”, based on a consistent statistical association between EMFs and a doubling of risk of childhood leukaemia, as reported by the Electric and Magnetic Fields Research and Public Information Dissemination Program [EMFRAPID] 2002).    A review of recent scientific literature shows many health effects being implicated as having probable or definite links to Electromagnetic Fields and Extremely Low Frequency vibrations (low hum) associated with high voltage overhead power lines when in proximity (e.g. <300m) to human and animal/bird populations including:

  • abnormal cell activity related to a variety of cancers, leukaemia, tumour growths, skin growths, brain cancers, Alzheimer’s Disease, Lou Gehrig’s Disease, breast cancer, childhood cancers, certain types of heart disease, genetic defects, foetal development problems, miscarriages, birth defects, male sexual dysfunction, electrical sensitivity symptoms, depression, suicide, etc.,
  • hormonal regulation and glandular disruptions such as immune system deficiencies, sleep and daily rhythm disturbances, mental and behavioural problems, perception and memory impairment, headache, nausea, nervous system disorders, blood and circulatory problems,
  • the ionisation of small pollution particles (e.g. diesel fumes) around exposed high voltage power lines produces charged particles (the ‘Corona Effect’) which when inhaled, have a much higher potential to remain in lung tissue and initiate disease.

The International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS), an association of renowned scientists, medical doctors and engineers involved in EMF and health research, met in Benevento, Italy in 2006. They reviewed the literature and passed the ‘Benevento Resolution’ which encourages governments to adopt a framework of guidelines for public and occupational EMF exposure that reflects a Precautionary Principle. The Precautionary Principle states that when there are indications of possible adverse effects, though they remain uncertain, the risks from doing nothing may be far greater than the risks of taking actions to control these exposures. The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof from those suspecting a risk to those who discount it.   In 2008, the ICEMS passed a further resolution in Venice which included the following statement:  “As an outcome, we are compelled to confirm the existence of non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields on living matter, which seem to occur at every level of investigation from molecular to epidemiological. Protection standards recommended by international standards organizations, and supported by the World Health Organization are, therefore, inadequate.”

The Australian and Victorian Governments (~1991) on this issue, decided that “…since there is some evidence that EMF’s may do harm, a policy of ‘Prudent Avoidance’ is recommended”.  Prudent Avoidance was described as looking systematically for strategies which can restrict EMF exposure and the adopting of strategies which seem to be prudent investments given their costs and the level of scientific understanding about the possible risks.

It is difficult, if not criminal, to discount statements of caution and recommendations made by the many doctors, scientists, engineers, members of the ICEMS and parliamentary working groups etc., who are experts on EMFs and their impacts on human and animal health.  We should be following Precautionary Principles and Prudently Avoiding impacts on EMFs from high voltage overhead power lines on people, animals, birds, and insects.

It is well known that EMFs are not emitted from buried cables, and most importantly, any magnetic field is greatly reduced both in intensity and in distance of impact.  Burying high voltage power lines significantly reduces the negative health effects on humans, animals, birds, and bees.  There have already been several legal findings with significant compensation awarded internationally for death and illnesses (human, animal, and birds) and losses of productivity (of farming land), attributable to the proximity of overhead high voltage power lines.

Health Concerns

Anxiety and Stress

Stress is another significant factor that has been shown to impact health across the animal kingdom.  As seen in the Eastlink Transmission Project, a great deal of stress and anxiety resulted from poor communication with the community and from people’s feelings of helplessness at not being able to control the health/safety of their own environments.

Dr Liz Stringer, a general practitioner who has consulted people directly affected by Eastlink, stated: “Many families and individuals have already been stressed just by the prospect of Eastlink. … stress and disease are very closely linked. Stress can undermine immunity. Stress can cause disease. Stress can kill. The stress and suffering caused by Eastlink are totally unnecessary”.

Share this post

Darley Power Fight Bury The Cables Banner

Join Now

Get Involved

The only way to make a difference is to get involved. It’s easy to sit back and wait for others to do something but when you are staring at 75-85m towers in a few years time, you will kicking yourself for not doing something when you had the chance.  This is OUR only chance to stop these towers, so get involved now.

Welcome to the home of Darley Power Fight. A group of residents in Darley, Coimadai and Merrimu, united against high voltage transmission towers passing through our backyard. We came together through the realisation the transmission line will divide a narrow corridor between Darley and the Lerderderg State Park; altering landscape character, causing widespread damage to critical habitat for threatened species, increasing fire risk to the Park and thousands of residents, destroy our visual amenity, harm local agriculture and will impact businesses and property values. It will completely desecrate, in a few years, what nature has taken millions of years to create.

Learn more…